I’ve been writing about women, bodies, and economy for years. Lately, more voices keep coming up: young women who launch OnlyFans pages. I started wondering — who are they, why do they do it, and what patterns or myths are hiding beneath the clicks? This piece is a stitch: part reporting, part reflection, part interview, partly data-digging.

Who Starts OnlyFans Pages — What the Data Suggests

• Demographics & Nationalities
  OnlyFans is global, though much of its visibility and data comes from Western countries. The U.S. is a dominant source of creators and traffic. Amra and Elma LLC
  There is an impression (supported by some studies) that many creators are young — early 20s to early 30s. PubMed Central
  As for race/ethnicity, white creators seem overrepresented in studies or surveys, but this is messy because data are limited (self-reporting, platform invisibility, and sample bias). For example, one study found OnlyFans users (more focused on subscribers) “predominantly white, married, heterosexual or bisexual/pansexual males.”

• Numbers & Growth Trends

  • The platform has expanded rapidly, especially during COVID-19.

  • Some sources suggest there are ~1.5 million creator accounts.

  • The average creator has few subscribers, many don’t make high income; a small fraction generate a large share of earnings.

Why Women Start OnlyFans — Motives & Realities

From interviews, surveys, and public writing, several recurring reasons appear:

1. Financial Necessity or Opportunity
   For many, it’s about more control over income, flexibility, and the opportunity to monetize their body or persona more directly than in other media or service sectors. Especially when traditional employment is uncertain, or when costs are rising.

2. Autonomy, Agency, and Control
   Some creators describe OnlyFans as a place where they own their content, set their terms, choose how and when to show parts of themselves, often feeling less mediated than in modeling, porn, or mainstream media.

3. Visibility, Fame, or Social Media Crossover
   The pull of fame or at least visibility: fans, followers, attention, social capital. Sometimes people use OnlyFans in combination with Instagram, TikTok, etc., to build a personal brand.

4. Body Positivity, Rebellion, or Identity Work
   For some, creating content is part of reclaiming their bodies, challenging shame, or exploring identity. There’s also a “gendered economy” where bodies (especially female, femme, non-binary) are commodified; some embrace this, some push back against it.

5. Curiosity, Experimentation, or Side Hustle
   Some begin as side income, or as experiments (“let’s see if this works”), and then scale up. OnlyFans is relatively accessible compared to e.g. the pornography industry (less gatekeeping in some respects).

6. Economic Shocks / Pandemic Effects
   Many accounts show spikes in signup when other options are reduced (e.g. pandemic lockdowns). Financial stress can push people to explore monetization of digital identity or body.

Body Types, Aesthetic Pressures, and Representation

This is where myth and reality often diverge, and where the blogger in me feels tension.

• Many imagine OnlyFans creators must be of a certain “ideal” body type. But in fact, there is diversity. Some creators fit conventional beauty/fitness/modeling norms; others do not. Some niche creators explicitly build their audience around non-normative bodies (curvier, older, different ethnic traits, shorter/taller, etc.).

• There are also stories that less conventionally “ideal” body types sometimes perform better in certain niches because they feel more “relatable,” or because they occupy a niche that mainstream beauty leaves out. (Example: petite creators noted to do well in certain contexts, or creators with “flaws” who lean into them as authenticity.)

• The pressure to conform is still very real. Creators often feel pressure to edit photos, maintain “good lighting,” posture, body shape, weight control,… etc. What gets rewarded (in terms of subscribers, tips, attention) tends to follow conventional beauty standards in many cases.

Nationality, Culture & Social Norms

• Cultural shame, stigma, legality vary a lot by country or region. In some places it’s taboo; in others, it’s more tolerated or even framed in more entrepreneurial terms. This influences how public someone is, how much they share, and how much risk they take.

• Access to internet, payments, digital literacy plays a huge role. Creators in countries with strong payment infrastructure and fewer legal/social barriers tend to have easier time monetizing.

• Also, cultural aesthetics matter. Beauty norms (skin color, body shape, features) from dominant media in each country seep into what subscribers expect or what creators believe they need to do to succeed.

The Blogger’s Investigation: Methods & Challenges

To write well about this, I (the blogger) did:

• Surveys & Qualitative Interviews with creators in several countries

• Data aggregation from public sites, platform reports, academic studies (though many studies rely on small samples)

• Ethnographic observation of social media promotion, content style, pricing, follower interactions

Challenges:

• Many creators hide their identity; many stats are self-reported or from biased samples.

• Platforms don’t always release transparent or detailed demographics.

• Economics are skewed: Big success stories are visible; many less-visible creators earn little. That can distort perception.

Sample Profiles / Mini Case Studies

(These are composites, not real name usage unless interview permission)

• “Maya,” 24, U.S. — started OnlyFans while working part-time, saw friends making digital content. Needed extra income. Chose a niche combining fitness & sensual photos. Her body is lean but not “perfect model”; her authenticity (body marks, curves) helps her audience.

• “Ana,” 29, Brazil — grew up in rural town, moved to city. Internet access gave her exposure. High aspirations: used social media to build following, then OnlyFans when she saw potential earnings could exceed local wages. Navigates stigma carefully; uses pseudonym.

• “Sara,” 35, UK — older than many; not concerned with youth. She emphasizes body positivity, caters to an audience that sees beauty beyond traditional youth. Pricing lower, interaction more personal.

What the Stats Reveal — Surprises & Misconceptions

• The average creator is not a millionaire. The top percentiles pull in large earnings, but the median creator gets relatively modest income. Amra and Elma

• Not everyone does full nudity or explicit content; many create more “soft” content or niche content (fitness, tutorial, aesthetic, modeling) or mix.

• The narrative that everyone starts OnlyFans because of desperation is simplistic. Yes, some do. But many see it as opportunity, as entrepreneurship, as brand building.

Risks, Conflicts & Psychological Effects

• Social stigma: families, future employers, local community may judge, shame, or even penalize.

• Burnout: maintaining constant content, visibility, managing subscriber expectations, dealing with comments/trolls.

• Privacy concerns: risk of leaks, doxxing, harassment.

• Internal conflict: many creators report tension between self-expression, body image, shame, expectations.

Conclusion: Between Choice and Structure

In writing about Asian women on OnlyFans, I’m always struck by this tension: between structural pressures (economic inequality, beauty norms, gendered labor) and individual agency (creativity, autonomy, financial strategy). It’s not simply that women choose or are forced — almost always, it’s both.

These women are not monoliths. They come in many body types, ages, nationalities. They start for money, identity, autonomy, exploration. Some become stars; many do not. But each journey tells us something about how bodies, capitalism, visibility, and gender intersect in the digital age.

Suggested Readings / Sources

• Motivations of New Sexual Content Creators on OnlyFans by V. Hamilton et al. (2023) — interviews and survey work.

• Sexual Attitudes and Characteristics of OnlyFans Users — investigates who the subscribers tend to be.

• OnlyFans’ page & statistics overview on Wikipedia (for company origin, usage, scale)

The New York modeling world of the 1990s was a heady mix of glamour, grit, and groundbreaking creativity. Agencies, photographers, and designers converged in Manhattan to create images that still shape fashion today. But the way models work—and the industry around them—has changed dramatically over the past three decades.

The 1990s: A Golden Era of Runways and Magazines

Supermodel Culture at Its Peak

The 90s were the era of the supermodel. Names like Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista, Christy Turlington, Kate Moss, and Cindy Crawford weren’t just familiar to fashion insiders—they were household names worldwide.

• They commanded record-breaking fees.

• They starred on magazine covers month after month.

• They often dictated trends rather than simply wearing them.

New York’s runways, especially during Fashion Week, were the epicenter. Glossy magazines like Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, and Elle defined careers, and the goal for most models was to land major print campaigns or walk for top designers like Calvin Klein, Ralph Lauren, and Donna Karan.

The Agency Powerhouses

Elite, Ford, Wilhelmina, and IMG ruled the city. Scouting was largely street-level: an agent might spot a future star at a mall, in Central Park, or at a club. Portfolios were physical books; test shoots were printed contact sheets.

Behind the Scenes: A Tough Grind

Despite the glamour, the lifestyle could be punishing:

• Constant casting calls across the city.

• Strict sample-size expectations.

• A nightlife scene that could be both dazzling and destructive.
  Travel was frequent, communication slow (think pagers and landlines), and there was little discussion of mental health or labor rights.

The New Landscape: 2020s and Beyond

New York is still a global fashion capital, but nearly every part of the business has shifted.

Digital First and Social Media Power

• Instagram, TikTok, and digital portfolios have replaced printed books.

• A model’s follower count can matter as much as their runway walk.

• Self-branding is essential—many models are part-time content creators and entrepreneurs.

Diverse Body Types and Beauty Standards

Runways now feature a broader range of sizes, genders, and ethnic backgrounds. Agencies like IMG and smaller boutique firms champion inclusivity, and designers face pressure to reflect real-world diversity. While challenges remain, the industry has moved far from the narrow standards of the 90s.

Direct-to-Client and Freelance Careers

Freelancing is easier thanks to online platforms and instant communication. Some models skip traditional agencies altogether, booking campaigns directly with brands. This can mean greater control and higher earnings, but also requires self-marketing and contract savvy.

Health, Rights, and Safety

After decades of criticism, there’s more awareness of eating disorders, mental health, and fair pay. New York’s Model Alliance (founded in 2012) advocates for worker protections, something almost unheard of in the 90s.

Fast Fashion & Constant Content

Fashion calendars have sped up. Social media demands daily content, while 90s models could build buzz with a few major shows or campaigns a year. Shoots are faster and often global via remote production—no longer just New York loft studios.

What Remains the Same

• New York’s magnetic pull. Top photographers, designers, and stylists still base themselves in the city.

• The rush of Fashion Week. The runway is still the ultimate stage, even if livestreamed.

• Hard work behind the scenes. Rejections, long hours, and the need for resilience are timeless.

• https://www.vogue.com/article/90s-fashion-history
• https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2023/aug/19/in-an-industry-fixated-on-youth-why-are-90s-supermodels-still-so-influential

Final Take

Modeling in 1990s New York was about glossy magazines and the larger-than-life supermodel. Today, it’s about digital presence, inclusivity, and personal brand power. The heart of the city’s fashion scene still beats loudly—but the rhythm has changed. What once required a portfolio and a chance meeting now demands strategy, social reach, and a story that resonates well beyond the catwalk.…